Home

how to get licensed to sell insurance to businesses from home?

May 12, 2008 by Steven N | Posted in Insurance

Q:

A: Each person state issues insurance licenses. Contact your states insurance department and they will give you licensing knowledge. Some states allow you to self study for the exam, some states require a 40 hour breeding and some states require you to be sponsored by an insurance company.
Find your state here
http://www.naic.org/aver_web_map.htm

Can you be successful running and insurance business from home?

Aug 26, 2007 by k_lee_84 | Posted in Insurance

Q: I figured if i was thriving to go to peoples homes and sell insurance for a company then wouldnt it be more productive just to sell it myself? Does anybody do this?

A: We sell for a Pty based out of fort worth, texas.
we are self-employed and work from home, stage set appointments and doing all the work from home, then going out and selling to the people in their homes.
Yes, it can be done and if you can get on the phone and set appointments for yourself and you are self motivated you can muddle through up to a 6 figure income.
We represent 8 different insurance companies, all A+++ Ratings , Strength and Life some Annuities, and Medicare Supplements.

can we benefit from allowing companies such as Auto/Home insurance Geico, Allstate to sell health insurance?

Jul 17, 2007 by Reginald R | Posted in Insurance

Q: The more people we have paying their own insurance will it ride down the cost due to competition?

A: - I'm not reliable what you mean by "allow"; who's stopping them? Got enough money to meet your nation's minimum requirement for starting an insurance company? No one will stop you; go ahead start your own fettle insurance company! GEICO backed by Berkshire Hathaway certainly has the financial approval to sell health insurance if they want to.

What few people realize in insurance pricing is insurance companies will price their policies based on what their struggle charges. Each company want to take on good risks, make a healthy profit bounds and NOT be considerably cheaper than their competition. In the health insurance biz we're talking a good 15% profit perimeter. In a auto only company like GEICO, the margin is more like 35-40%.
In central Ohio where I fare there are around 500 companies selling auto insurance but only a dozen (maybe as many as 20) that proffer individual or group health policies.
Why the big difference? Health insurance has higher frequency of use and is more handling intense than auto insurance. Larger companies have an economy of scale. Since the number of salubriousness insurance policies is limited by the demand for health insurance which is limited by the number of people who can bear the expense it or are considered "insurable" by health companies, having more companies would convey each insurer is processing fewer people, forcing costs per person up not down. Having more companies will NOT significance in effect insurers to take on high-risk clients or force down the costs of medicine or treatment.

There are a bother of industries that do NOT benefit from competition (electric generation and delivery for instance) and that the regime should take an active role. Medical insurance is one of them. Want competition? Force private companies to conflict for clients with a national medical program.

Sell Insurance From Home!!!

Are you kinky of driving to no show appointments, and dialing high cost leads for mortgage safeguard? If the answer is yes, then watch this video ...

Pelosi: Case growing for government to sell insurance in ...

by Erica Werner

“The desideratum for a renowned way out is very acute,” the California Democrat told reporters at her weekly hearsay convention, making the Donnybrook as lawmakers on both sides of the Capitol worked to sew up wholesale legislation extending coverage to millions of the uninsured.

Whether the Senate bill will encompass a social scheme in any shape is a outstanding ask landmark, but “our Quarter bill will have a consumers way out,” the California Democrat declared.

“Anyone who had any doubts about the have occasion for for such an way out prerequisite only look at the behavior of the fettle insurance diligence this week,” Pelosi said. “The philosophy that we would have constitution insurance turn over a new leaf without a notable privilege becomes less favourite.”

She was referring to an sedulousness-funded memorize that said insurance premiums would hillock under fitness fix up legislation advanced by the Senate Money management Panel earlier this week. Pelosi also referenced an insurance dynamism ad campaign targeted at seniors.

The tub-thumper has been on the malign against fitness insurers for months, but the latest developments absolutely strengthened her alter into to garner them pay. She also said the Clan was now taking into consideration adding to its condition mind a look after bill a $6.7 billion-a-year fee on insurance companies that is part of the Senate Fund case.

“There are some things we’d like to see turn up to the insurance companies that they might not like,” Pelosi said.

It’s been complete for some prematurely that the Organization robustness patch up bill would acceptable group a clientele envision, but its organize remains inconstant. However, the stronger model favored by liberals — one that would use reimbursement rates to providers based on Medicare rates — may be gaining favor.

Pelosi supports that reading though she said a unalterable ruling hadn’t been made. She said that if people are prospering to be required to leverage haleness insurance — as all the vigorousness bills on Capitol Hill over — they prerequisite to have access to the cheaper rates domination insurance could make.

Read more...